Uso de Cookies
EIS Digital utiliza cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar la navegabilidad de nuestra página, su acceso y la personalización de nuestros contenidos. Si continúa accediendo a nuestra página, entendemos que nos otorga su consentimiento expreso para su uso. Puede obtener más información sobre las mismas y su configuración en nuestra Política de Cookies.

The Future of Coding in Schools

Mitch Resnick, one of the creators of Scratch, on why he thinks coding should be taught in all schools—it's not the reason you’d expect.

REVISTA DE PRENSA • 18/12/2017

For more than three decades, Mitch Resnick has immersed himself in educational technology and innovative learning models. Now a professor at the MIT Media Lab, and a co-creator of the popular Scratch programming language, Resnick remains a tireless advocate for student-centered education, collaborative learning environments, and the idea that coding is a form of literacy.

His new book, Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity Through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play, is a look at our current educational moment. “Roughly two-thirds of grade school students will end up doing work that hasn’t been invented yet,” Resnick contends, hinting at the emerging worlds of artificial intelligence, self-driving cars, and “smart” houses. How do we prepare today’s students to meet that challenge?

We talked with Resnick about the importance of coding in our school system, his thoughts on the changing roles of teachers, and new ways to engage students—and assess their work.

EDUTOPIA: You moved from journalism—writing about computers and business—to the field of educational technology and learning in the 1980s. What inspired that move?

MITCH RESNICK: The most important shift for me in thinking about computers and learning was actually the spring of 1982, the West Coast Computer Faire—which is like an early form of Maker Faire—and Seymour Papert was giving a keynote address. When I heard Seymour talk, it gave me new vision of what role computers might play in people’s lives: They weren’t just machines to get a job done—they could enable people to express themselves in new ways, and change the way people thought about themselves and thought about the world. That was very exciting to me.

EDUTOPIA: Are we still struggling with Papert’s early insight—almost astonishing at the time—that the computer isn’t just a processor of information but a platform for constructing human knowledge?

RESNICK: Yes I think so, and it mirrors a struggle in the education system that has nothing to do with technology. Many people think of learning and education as a process of delivering information or delivering instruction. Other people see learning and education as student-centered—learning is about exploring, experimenting, creating. Those are very different visions that predate the computer, but of course the computer can fit into either of those two models. It’s a wonderful device for delivering information, but it can also be a wonderful device for creating, exploring, and experimenting.

EDUTOPIA: There are influential people, like Apple CEO Tim Cook, saying, “What we need to do is get coding into every single public school. It needs to be a requirement in public schools across the board.” Is that right?

RESNICK: If it were up to me, I would introduce it. But I want to be careful because I don’t want to embrace it for the same reason that some people might. The first question I would ask is: “Why should we learn coding at all?” Many people embrace coding in schools as a pathway to jobs as computer programmers and computer scientists, and of course they’re right that those opportunities are expanding rapidly. But that’s not a great reason for everyone to learn how to code.

Very few people grow up to be professional writers, but we teach everyone to write because it’s a way of communicating with others—of organizing your thoughts and expressing your ideas. I think the reasons for learning to code are the same as the reasons for learning to write. When we learn to write, we are learning how to organize, express, and share ideas. And when we learn to code, we are learning how to organize, express, and share ideas in new ways, in a new medium.

EDUTOPIA: What does that look like in the school system? Does coding sit alongside math and reading? Is it integrated in some way?

RESNICK: These days I talk about our approach in terms of these four words that begin with the letter p: projects, passion, peers, and play. So that’s the approach I would take with coding, but also with any other learning: getting students to work on projects, based on their passion, in collaboration with peers, in a playful spirit. And each of those p’s is important. I think work on projects gives you an understanding of the creative process, how to start with just the inkling of an idea and then to build a prototype, share it with people, experiment with it, and continue to modify and improve it.

We know that kids are going to work longer and make deeper connections to the content when they are passionate about the ideas—when they care—and when they’re learning with and being inspired by peers. And I’d want to have kids experience coding in the same way.

EDUTOPIA: You’re describing a high-choice learning environment rooted in student passion and project work. Where’s the teacher in that mix?

RESNICK: The teacher still plays an incredibly important role, but in this approach it’s not so much about delivering instruction. One role the teacher is playing is the role of connector—connecting peers with one another to work together on solving problems. Teachers also act as catalysts by asking provocative questions: “What do you think will happen if...?” or “That surprised me, why do you think that happened?”

They’re consultants, too, and it’s not just about consulting on technical skills, but also about things like how you continue to work on something even when you are frustrated, or suggesting strategies for working with diverse groups of people. Finally, the teacher can be a collaborator, working together with kids on projects—because kids should see teachers as learners too.

EDUTOPIA: It sounds like a more democratic, open system, which seems to imply breaking down a lot of barriers?

RESNICK: I think breaking down barriers is a good way to think about it. When I think about the type of things that I might change in schools—and I know none of it is easy—a lot of it is about breaking down barriers. Break down the barriers between class periods, because 50-minute chunks are too constraining if you want to work on projects. Break down the barriers between disciplines, because meaningful projects almost always cut across disciplines. Break down the barriers between ages and have older kids work with younger kids—both groups benefit. And break down the barriers between inside of school and outside of school—have kids work on projects that are meaningful to their communities and bring people from the communities into the schools to support the teachers.

That’s one way of dealing with the challenge of a single teacher committed to 30 or more kids. It doesn’t have to be that way. Older kids can be helping younger kids, people from the community can be helping.

EDUTOPIA: A fair question—and a common criticism—is: How do you figure out whether kids are learning anything? How do you assess it?

RESNICK: I would take a portfolio-like approach, looking at what kids create. That’s what we do in our Scratch online community. You can see that a kid has created several dozen digital projects, and you can look through their projects and see their progression. For example, you might see the gradual adoption of new strategies—new types of artwork, but also new and improved programming structures.

I acknowledge that it’s difficult to arrive at quantitative measures, but I also think we each don’t necessarily need to. I sometimes make the analogy to the way I’ve been evaluated here at MIT. There are actually no quantitative measures in the process. Basically, they look at my portfolio: They see what I’ve created, they look at the trajectory and the progress over time, and they ask other people’s opinions about it. You’ll sometimes hear, “Well that’s not serious, we need quantitative measures to be serious.” Are they making the claim that MIT is not serious? I understand the criticism that it’s inefficient, but I think those are things we are going to need to deal with.

Again, it’s a big change and I’m not saying it’s easy, but I do think we need to move in that direction.

Autor: Stephen Merrill en Edutopia el 7/12/2017.

Búsqueda por fechas

Margaret Boden: "La inteligencia artificial, como el hacha, se puede usar para el bien o para el mal"
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 09/05/2018
Margaret Boden (Maggie para los amigos) ha visto de todo desde 1936. Nació en el Londres de los bombardeos y de Alan Turing, se abrió paso en el masculino mundo de la ciencia y se descolgó en 1977 con Inteligencia Artificial y Hombre Natural, uno de los libros pioneros en un campo que ha contribuido a ensanchar gracias a su 'sabiduría' adquirida en los mundos de la medicina, de la filosofía, de la psicología y de las ciencias cognitivas. A sus 82 años, Boden sigue activa desde su mirador en la Universidad de Sussex, fiel a su condición de insaciable "mariposa intelectual". Nos recibe con vestido floreado en su casa de Brighton, que pronto sentimos como nuestra. Y nos invita a hacer un recorrido por las estanterías donde alternan libros y pequeños frascos de vidrio que se estiran hasta tiempos de los romanos.
“Enseñamos a los niños a aprobar exámenes, pero no a pensar y a entender las matemáticas”
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 30/05/2018
Cuando el profesor Yeap Ban Har (Penang, 1968) habla de matemáticas, utiliza términos a menudo vinculados con el mundo de las letras, pero no con el de los números. Para este experto, referente mundial en la enseñanza de matemáticas, aprender esta materia no es tanto hacer cálculos como interiorizar un nuevo idioma. Las matemáticas se leen, se escriben e incluso se debaten. Doctor en educación matemática por la Universidad Tecnológica de Nanyang, en Singapur, y profesor en el Instituto Nacional de Educación del mismo centro, Yeap ha recalado esta semana en Madrid para aportar luz a una pregunta compleja: ¿cómo enseñar matemáticas en los colegios? El experto, que viaja por todo el mundo dando formación a docentes, es la cara visible de un proyecto que la editorial educativa SM y la Universidad de Alcalá pusieron en marcha el año pasado para probar en 20 colegios españoles el llamado método Singapur de enseñanza de las matemáticas.
«Debería existir una formación obligatoria para todas las personas que decidan tener un hijo»
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 30/05/2018
Víctor Arufe, ganador de los Premios Educa «Mejor docente de España 2017», no duda al asegurar que la educación de los niños es compleja y requiere de mucho esfuerzo por parte de los progenitores. Añade que los pequeños perciben el mundo de una forma muy diferente a los adultos, y es en esta perspectiva distinta del mundo donde radica la mayoría de los conflictos entre padres e hijos. ¿Qué pueden hacer los padres para que no resulte tan complicado educar a los hijos? Los adultos debemos hacer un esfuerzo en bajar al mundo de los hijos, un mundo donde no entienden, por ejemplo, que les quites las tijeras de forma brusca cuando van a empezar a jugar con ellas. No son conscientes del peligro, y esa reacción brusca de los padres les produce una rabieta inmediata, que puede pasar posteriormente a los gritos y a la autoridad del padre sobre el niño.
Todo lo que puedes hacer para lograr hijos bien educados
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 31/05/2018
¡Ya estoy harta! Ya está bien, señores, de seguir aguantando». Así de efusiva y enfadada se mostraba hace unos días Eva Romero, profesora del Instituto Isidro Arcenegui de Marchena (Sevilla), al exponer en el claustro de profesores su indignación «por la mala educación de los alumnos y el proteccionismo de los padres, que quieren que sus hijos aprueben sin sufrir. Me pagan por enseñar, no por aguantar», clamaba. ¿Qué está ocurriendo? ¿Por qué cada vez más docentes se quejan de que sus alumnos les faltan al respeto? ¿Por qué el profesor Don José es ahora para los alumnos Pepe o Pepito? ¿Quién tiene la verdadera responsabilidad de dotar de buena educación a los niños: los padres o el colegio? Para María Jesús Álava Reyes, directora del Centro de Psicología Álava Reyes, es evidente que se ha producido un deterioro en la buena educación y el respeto a los demás y «muchas familias no son conscientes del mal que están haciendo a sus hijos al consentir que sean egoístas, que se crean con derecho a todo, que puedan conseguir las cosas sin esfuerzo, a cambio de nada....».
¿Por qué en España nadie quiere ser profesor?
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 12/06/2018
El informe «Effective Teacher Policies: Insights from PISA» presentado ayer en Madrid por el padre del Informe PISA, Andreas Schleicher, hace una sesuda evaluación de la situación del profesorado y de su importante papel en las escuelas con más desventaja socioeconómica. El informe concluyó que para mejorar los resultados académicos y conseguir un sistema más equitativo los profesores más brillantes deben destinarse a los colegios más desfavorecidos. Pero aparte de este análisis, el estudio entrevistó a alumnos de 15 años para saber qué querían ser de mayores. Solo un 4,2 por ciento dijo que quería ser profesor. Destacan, sobre todo, las chicas (5,8 frente a 2,7 de los chicos), de origen no inmigrante y cuyos padres tienen educación superior. En España, el 5,6 por ciento de los estudiantes quiere enseñar y en este porcentaje se incluyen los adolescentes que no sacan buenos resultados en PISA. Lo mismo sucede en resto de países de la OCDE.